An easy way to flatten a good scene is to explain each gesture immediately after it happens. A character turns away and we are told why. Someone offers a favor and the narration assures us it is genuine. The author has done all the interpreting. The reader can only nod.

Consider a choir rehearsal. Josie has missed three weeks. When she slips into the back row, her old folder is gone. A clean copy of the score waits on the stand. The conductor sees her, lifts his baton, and begins.

A conscientious first draft may add: he had put the score there because he still wanted her in the choir, although he was too hurt to say so. We know what the paper means, what he feels, and how Josie should respond. The moment has been solved before it can land.

Let the object speak first

The score can do less and become more interesting. Leave it on the stand. Let Josie turn to page seven and discover a penciled correction in the conductor's hand. He planned for her to sing, but we cannot tell whether he forgave her or merely needed another alto.

It is fair for readers to wonder about motive when they have enough to understand the action. It is less fair to hide the physical facts required to follow a scene. If there are two scores, say where they are. If Josie cannot read the correction, do not pretend she can. Confusion about logistics is not emotional complexity.

Three kinds of sentences

When revising, try marking three things in different colors: what happened, what a character believes happened, and what the narrator tells us it means. Those functions sometimes overlap. Trouble starts when the third arrives every time the first appears.

Cut one explanation and watch what becomes possible. Maybe Josie takes the score as a welcome while a reader catches the conductor counting the empty chairs. Maybe both interpretations survive until the break, when he says, “I kept your place. I didn't promise it forever.” That line gives shape to an emotion the reader has already had a chance to sense.

Restraint can become a pose, though. If a crucial choice depends on why Josie missed rehearsal, and the story hides that reason only to manufacture surprise, the omission is doing a cheap job. Give the audience the relevant truth when it changes the stakes.

What stays on the page

Read the scene once without the explanatory sentences. Ask what a careful reader can infer and what they would be forced to guess. Restore the essential facts. Leave room around the judgments the characters themselves have not settled.

Fiction does not require its readers to be detectives. It does benefit from letting them participate. A score left on a stand can hold a question that two paragraphs of explanation would quietly answer for them.

Part of Beyond the Known, an independent journal by Arin Vale.

Related craft reading: The Detail That Never Saves the Day — a counterpoint on when a seemingly unnecessary detail deserves to remain.

Read our editorial approach